But for 24-year-old social media influencer Ari Kytsya, things were different on Monday, as she entered a lecture hall at the University of Washington to be not greeted by the faint buzzing sounds of TikTok audio or flashes from ring lights, but with ‘murmurs of academics, from 1,200 university students attending Psych 201. She, with her online presence spread across TikTok, Instagram, and other platforms like OnlyFans, had agreed to deliver a speech on human sexuality for a lesson unit by Dr. Nicole, a psychology teacher.
But for many students, the appearance represented an opportunity to examine the digital labor, sexual economics, and individual agency involved in an online presence that is discussed more than it is understood. But for many online viewers, it sparked something different: yet another chapter in America’s never-ending debate about sex work, influencers, and academic boundaries.
With 2.6 million followers on Instagram and five million on TikTok, Kytsya has based her online persona on comedy, lip-syncing, striking visuals, and complete transparency about cosmetic surgery. While she has shared information about her surgeries in a way that capitalizes on her appearance to build online success, she has also given followers compelling reasons to support her.
On campus, her talk was about ‘Surviving Digital Economies, Performing an Online Persona, Psychological Implications for Sexualized Public Spaces’. But online, it was something else entirely.
A Viral Appearance Meets a Volatile Internet
Shortly after the guest lecture was featured on Barstool Sports, reactions on social media took off. What was being lectured on in class, human sexuality, took a backseat to ideological debates about the credentials of Kytsya’s work.
Some of the more extreme reactions included warnings about cultural decay.
“This period will be studied by historians in the future to understand the unraveling of the West.”
Some discussed whether it was appropriate to invite someone from OnlyFans to talk at an intellectual level.
“This is an online prostitute whose work is why there is so much porn sickness in our society.”
Some have indicated her presence symbolized declining education standards.
“Imagine having to pay 100k in tuition to be lectured by an OnlyFans model. America is cooked.”
Some also emphasized other concerns related to sex work and youth culture.
“Online hoes invited at Colleges/Universities is crazy. To deliver what? Digital prostitution?”
One commentator, however, highlighted the context ignored in most critiques.
“If you pay attention to internet slop like I do, you would learn that 201 is a sex class, so I do not understand why this is such a big issue.”
Rather, the overall response revealed more about society’s divide concerning sex work, cyber media, and what constitutes legitimate areas for scholarly research, with some believing these represent threats to mainstream societal values, while others accept them for what they are: legitimate areas for research.
Inside the Lecture Hall, a Different Scene
‘The students in the full auditorium have described it as a curious, interested, and in some instances, strangely thoughtful audience.’
“It didn’t seem like a spectacle,” one student noted. “It seemed like it was a class trying to figure out what’s going on with sex and social media.”
Dr. Nicole, teaching this particular course, has in the past utilized guest lecturers with different backgrounds, ranging from therapists to sex educators, to enable students to gain broader insight into the relationship between sex and culture. It is said that Kytsya’s appearance also fits in with that policy.
