Fashion’s biggest night couldn’t escape a bit of scandal, and this year, it wasn’t a sheer dress or a political statement that set the internet ablaze. It was the unexpected presence of 22-year-old OnlyFans model Camilla Araujo at a 2025 Met Gala afterparty that lit the match, and Twitter, true to form, did what it does best: implode.
While she didn’t walk the famed Met steps or get photographed inside the exhibit alongside Anna Wintour’s handpicked elite, Araujo made sure she was part of the night’s conversation. And judging by the reaction, she succeeded spectacularly.
From Bedroom to Red Carpet: Camilla Araujo’s Luxe Arrival Sets the Internet Off
Araujo, who reportedly pulls in $1.4 million a month from her subscription-based content created in the infamous “Bop House,” made a dramatic prelude to her New York arrival. In a video posted to her social media (captioned simply, “Hello Met Gala”), she’s seen descending the stairs of her private jet, nonchalant in a grey tracksuit and slippers, an anti-glamour move if there ever was one.
Then came the transformation. A follow-up video featured Araujo at a Met Gala afterparty, draped in an elegant black gown and walking the red carpet like she’d been doing it her whole life. There were no press shots from the Met Gala steps, but the message was clear: she was there, rubbing shoulders with the elite, including Diana Ross, Zendaya, Nicki Minaj, and Rihanna, who were all spotted leaving the same hotel she exited earlier that evening.
Twitter Turns Into a Battlefield: Slut-Shaming vs. Sex Positivity in the Camilla Discourse
The online reaction was, in a word, chaotic. The takes ranged from slut-shaming rants to gleeful celebrations of Araujo’s rise and everything in between.
One critic tweeted:
“making whores famous for being whores bro.. this world we live in is soooo pathetic rn”
It didn’t take long for others to clap back, noting the hypocrisy in how society consumes sex work while shaming the women behind it:
“She is rich and famous like everyone else there…… men feel fine paying for porn from the comfort of their homes but get upset when women that found a way to be successful in such a sick industry are seen in a context other than sexual.”
Another user reminded folks that Araujo is hardly the first woman with a controversial past to climb the social ladder:
“Have people forgotten what made Kim Kardashian famous was a sextape?”
And if that wasn’t enough truth for the timeline, someone else added:
“Men are the ones who make OF girls famous then get mad at them when they are in red carpets.”
This was not just a debate about one influencer’s presence at a party. It was a flashpoint for conversations about class, sexuality, and the long-standing discomfort with women who profit from their desirability on their own terms.
Sex Work and High Fashion Have Always Danced Together: Some of Y’all Just Forgot
Lest anyone forget, fashion and sex work have long shared DNA. One user pulled out the receipts:
“She’s rich and can make a donation to the cause, she’s also influential and not to mention that the fashion world has long taken influence from SWs (Learn your history).”
And they’re not wrong. From high fashion’s obsession with lingerie aesthetics to the rise of “heroin chic” and the glorification of eroticism, the line between muse and object has always been blurry. Camilla Araujo just had the audacity to make that line very clear and walked it in stilettos.
Fashion Elitism or Favoritism? Fans Call Out Met Gala for Snubbing Actual Style Icons
Of course, some critiques weren’t aimed at Araujo directly, but at the Met Gala’s inconsistent logic. Influencer and fashion darling Wisdom Kaye, beloved for his avant-garde menswear looks and massive TikTok presence, was notably absent. That fact didn’t go unnoticed:
“wait not to piggyback off hating on this beautiful girl, but her being invited and wisdom kaye NOT having been invited to this met gala is… very telling lol”
It’s a fair question. When an adult content creator gets an afterparty invite while one of social media’s most fashion-forward figures is benched, people are going to raise eyebrows.
Internet Split Between Applause and Outrage While Camilla Remains Unbothered
Some people just wanted to hate, nothing new under the sun. One particularly venomous post read:
“AnnaBitch, this bargain-bin acting career of yours isn’t cutting it. Neither is being a glorified hoe. Time to pivot. OnlyFans might be your best shot at a MET Gala invite.”
Meanwhile, Araujo stans were out in full force:
“YALL HATE TO SEE AN ABSOLUTE QUEEN WINNING AHAHAHAAAAAA FUCK YEAH CAMILLAAAAA”
Others questioned the entire spectacle itself:
“Who actually cares about shit like this?”
And some provided some much-needed nuance:
“She’s barely a OF girl. She barely pops a fucking titty on the damn site. She’s an influencer who takes risqué modeling pictures.”
It’s a fair point. Araujo has carefully curated a brand that straddles the line between adult modeling and social media stardom. She isn’t creating hardcore content. She’s monetizing allure. And now, she’s monetizing access.
What Camilla Araujo’s Appearance Really Says About Fame, Power, and 2025 Culture
What does Camilla Araujo’s Met Gala afterparty appearance actually represent? More than just one girl’s Cinderella moment, it’s a sharp reflection of the way fame operates now. In an age where virality, not pedigree, is the ticket to elite spaces, Araujo’s climb feels inevitable.
You don’t need a Vogue cover, a Marvel contract, or a Grammy anymore. Sometimes, all it takes is a ring light, a mansion full of influencers, and a really lucrative subscription model.
And if that makes people uncomfortable, maybe that says more about them than it does about her.
Whether you loathe her, stan her, or couldn’t care less, Camilla Araujo’s appearance at a Met Gala afterparty has once again proved that the internet has a short fuse and women who own their sexuality still set it off faster than a sparkler on the Fourth of July.
