Diddy Denies Scandalous Claims, Says Cassie’s ‘Freak-Off’ Videos Show She Was ‘Happy and Dominant’

Sean “Diddy” Combs contends that videos cited by prosecutors as evidence of misconduct actually substantiate his innocence. According to court documents obtained by TMZ, Diddy’s defense team argues that these recordings depict consensual sexual activities between Combs and his former girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, during their long-term relationship.

The defense describes the footage as showcasing “private sexual activity between consenting adults,” emphasizing that Cassie, referred to as “Victim-1” in the indictment, appeared “happy, dominant, and fully in control” during these encounters. This portrayal challenges the prosecution’s characterization of the videos as “elaborate and produced sex performances.” Diddy’s attorneys assert that the recordings are straightforward depictions of consensual sex, dismissing allegations of orgies or sex parties.

Furthermore, the defense refutes claims that the recordings were made without consent, stating there were “no hidden cameras, no involvement of other celebrities, no underground tunnels, no minors, and no signs of coercion or violence.” They also note that Cassie retained the recordings on her devices for years and voluntarily provided them to authorities, countering the prosecution’s assertion that Diddy kept them as leverage. Diddy maintains that the videos were neither stored on his devices nor seized from his property.

These assertions come amid a series of legal challenges for Combs. Since November 2023, he has faced multiple accusations, including sexual misconduct, drugging, physical abuse, sex trafficking, and racketeering. Notably, his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura filed a lawsuit accusing him of rape and physical abuse, which was settled swiftly. Subsequent allegations from other individuals have surfaced, leading to his arrest in September 2024 on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. Combs has consistently denied all allegations, labeling them as financially motivated attempts against him.