Content creator Livy Alex, who uses the username Livy Alex, denounced what she considered a predatory contract from a manager agency associated with influencer Clavicular. This caused heated debate about the prevalence of predatory behavior in the creator economy.
On a livestream, Livy Alex reported that someone from Clavicular’s management offered her a contract to work for his OnlyFans agency under an 80-20 profit share in the manager’s favor, which she declined.
“Somebody on Clav’s team offered me a contract for his OnlyFans agency. I heard that the split is 80-20. So he’s like, well, the method is you have to get on my stream, and you have to suck my dick, and you’re gonna make 300k plus on OnlyFans. What type of scam is that? Anyway, exposed. I think it’s shit that’s already been out. I’m just saying that I got offered one.”
Livy Alex also indicated that she would rather end streaming entirely than agree to such terms. “I’d rather literally kill myself, but that’s fine.”
Clavicular, whose real name is Braden Peters, is a 20-year-old influencer with a focus on looksmaxxing content, which involves physical self-improvement, as well as erratic streams and controversial behavior. Peters has faced multiple arrest warrants related to battery and a hospitalization linked to a possible overdose. Recently, he entered the world of OnlyFans management.
Many viewers and commenters quickly pointed out how this deal would affect a creator’s finances. Considering that OnlyFans typically retains 20% of creators’ revenue, the 80/20 agency agreement would mean the creator earns less than 16 cents per dollar.
“Also, this is on top of the 20% OF already takes, so she’d be losing 40%,” one commenter stated. “Some agencies even want a 50/50 split, but again, you’ll be losing money because of the 20% OF takes. These agencies are so predatory and scam girls out of the money they make from their content and bodies. It’s gross. Stay far away from any agency that wants to have control over your page.”
Others voiced their concerns about OnlyFans’ overall economics. “Everyone’s complaining about the taxation OF has—that’s really not sustainable,” one commenter said. “20% isn’t sustainable for creators. That means you can only make money through smaller payments. So, 20% of $100 is $20. 20% of $2,000 is $200.”
Finally, some people suggested investigating these organizations legally. “These people having OF agencies is outright illegal and should be investigated.”
